'Wiring' The Wire: Transtextual layers and tragic realism in The Wire
scholar.google.com
scholar.google.com
It’s a good show and absolutely worth watching, but there is definitely some over-hype at play every time it’s mentioned. It is also constructed in such a way that makes it easy to chop up pieces that are memorable and suited for media consumption: catchy one-liners, interesting nicknames, and some frankly implausible characters that are borderline superheroes but treated as being hyper realistic.
As I wrote in my initial comment, the show is great but has an irritating fan base that is hostile to anyone suggesting that it isn’t a documentary. It’s a television show that uses fairly standard narrative techniques to tell a story. That doesn’t mean it’s made up; but it does mean that it isn’t a unquestionably factual story, as its fan base would like you to believe.
It’s a very similar situation to people that insist New York is the greatest city in the world. Yeah, it’s an awesome place, and probably in the top ten. But this obsession with “being the best city/best TV show of all time” clouds judgement and becomes a cultish attitude after awhile.
The Wire was special in several ways: First was the dialogue, especially the Baltimore accent and slang. I never even heard anything close to that. I'm in Europe, BTW, and even with subtitles I had a hard time following (that was before urbandictionary, mind you). It was actually years later that I learned Idris Elba is British, which still blows my mind.
The characters and casting are impeccable. Idris Elba, Dominic West, Lance Reddick, Wendell Pierce, Wood Harris, all absolutely incredible and pitch perfect in their roles. Probably most memorable is Michael Williams as Omar Little, a side character in the show which is impossible to forget.
It's not a perfect series, but I'd say the first season is damn near it. I would even go as far to say that it's probably enough to watch the first season to get most of what this series wants to say, mainly to watch the tragedy of the war on drugs from the deeply humanist perspective of David Simon. IMHO the later seasons never matched the first one. On the contrary: the later seasons usually have one central theme which is explored (like journalism, education, etc.) and get a bit preachy at times. Also, the series lacks character development. Yes, people become more cynical and burnt out, but they are already very cynical and burnt out to begin with, so there's really not that much to build upon...
Each season added a theme to the show - the first was the streets, the second was blue collar workers, etc. This was very much on purpose, I thought, and well-executed.
Bodie, Carver, Daniels, Cutty, and those are only the ones I can remember on the spot now...
And Bubs! Bubs has clearly the best character arc ever
there´s
- We Own This City
and
- Homicide: Life on the Street
WOTC is indeed a follow-up of sort (same author as The Wire, produced recently), but the real follow-up to The Wire (i.e. what David Simon did straight after, bringing with him a bunch of actors from The Wire) was the short-lived Treme.
The taboo thing about any sexual topic is very American. I never understood where that comes from. I always suspected it came from religion as I don't have any but American society seems to be more religion-centric. But here where most people aren't religious, things like sex work are pretty normal.
Presumably he gets paid for this. He seems to have published reams of similar content.
Without being too harsh, it's now apparent to me that chatbots can replace entire categories of academics.
Surely you spend all your time curing cancer right?