Study asks: Can cell phone signals help land a plane?
newsreleases.sandia.gov
newsreleases.sandia.gov
> “There are actual apps you can download that allow you to spoof your location, and entire subreddits dedicated to showing you how to use it for various games,” Sanderson said.
Not judging the research itself, but this is kind of a dumb statement. The type of "spoofing" that you can do by just installing an app, which merely causes the OS to return fake coordinates, has virtually nothing in common with the type of "spoofing" that would threaten an aircraft by actually transmitting fake radio signals.
I was just envisioning a local jammer being problematic for ILS systems.
So like the already existing VOR/DME network?
> The idea is to use these alternative signals to calculate a vehicle’s position and velocity.
All commercial planes have an IMU/ADIRU in them. Most are doubly if not triply redundant.
> There is no question GPS is still the gold standard for navigation
Not for flight. There are plenty of areas in Europe where it is compromised to the point of being useless.
> Scientists refer to it as “signals of opportunity”
Way back in the day pilots would use FM radio stations in the same way. If you were really lost out somewhere over a dark patch.
> If these signals are clean enough for navigation,
The bigger problem you have is while these are "fixed location" services our database of the locations isn't exactly awesome or well maintained in the face of maintenance or physical changes.
"Signals of opportunity" for flight is a bizarre regime to even consider.
Assuming you’re taking about ADF, that would use AM radio stations as a pseudo-NDB (or to listen to a ballgame).
GPS spoofing confuses the Ground Collision Avoidance System, which uses GPS position and elevation maps to report nearness to the ground. The false alarm rate is now so high that such systems are useless in parts of the world.
There's a lot of this spoofing going on. Look at the maps in the report.
[1] https://ops.group/dashboard/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/GPS-S...
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loran-C
Turns out having a more resilient backup is useful.
China has built out an eLoran system (as well as a fibre-based precise-timing infrastructure):
* https://www.gpsworld.com/china-completes-national-eloran-net...
* https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/23/12703
* https://www.gpsworld.com/china-finishing-high-precision-grou...
I don't think Loran-c gives enough accuracy to land a plane all by itself, but it should get you to the airport, after which local beacons (VOR) will align you with the runway, and ILS will get you safely on the ground in IFR conditions.
As others have said, this seems to be a contrived "problem" to be solving. VOR, ADF, DME/DME and ILS already exist and work without GNSS. There's also LORAN if we were to need a ground based equivalent to GNSS.
The US's navaid infrastructure is old. Not all airports have the "luxury" of ILS.
In the US, per FCC rules, it is not officially allowed to listen to other GNSS frequencies as they are not licensed:
> The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rules require licensing of non-federal receive-only equipment operating with foreign satellite systems, including receive-only earth stations operating with non-U.S. licensed radionavigation-satellite service (RNSS) satellites.
* https://www.gps.gov/spectrum/foreign/
The FCC allowed Galileo use in 2018:
* https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-approves-galileo-global-nav...
I think the reasoning is that if it is not "officially sanctioned" then if there's interference with those signals it's not the FCC's problem. By allowing it they'll take noise on those frequencies more seriously in rules and enforcement.
Strange thing is there is no Chinese GNSS in view. (I was on a short trip to Bali recently and iirc I did see Chinese GNSS on the app while there so I think the app and phone hardware is capable of picking up Chinese GNSS?).
That app may simply be reporting the presence of signals, but the geolocation functions and APIs may not actually use those signals in their calculations.
And if they are actually processing the signals, then they are breaking FCC regulations:
* https://selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/media/press-releas...
Legally they could get their FCC certification pulled and not be allowed to be sold in the US if they are doing that.
I can't find any benchmarks though that measures this
Still, what‘s also possible is to use PTP as backup (e.g., over eCPRI) and use the fiber / microwave backhaul to some master clock with, say, a ribidium time source as a backup, so I think it‘s not entirely unreasonable to assume that cell phone signals will remain available in the presence of a GPS outage.
If the towers are uniquely identified, and are geo-located accurately, it could be possible to triangulate your position even if they are not operational from a make-a-phonecal perspective. They just have to perhaps keeps shouting "I'm here!".
Perhaps they'd at least need a semi-accurate time source? (Like a local rubidium clock, or at least NTP/PTP over a fibre backhaul.) On the other hand smartphones can geolocate themselves decently from Wifi AP signals, and those tend to not have timestamps with-in the broadcasts.
Jamming can impact much more than just a limited area. Just ask anyone near a border with Russian:
Like Estonia:
* https://hackaday.com/2020/09/08/teardown-mini-gps-jammer/
And a single one can mess up an entire airport until its found:
* https://trans.info/en/gps-jammer-that-brought-disruption-to-...
* https://insidegnss.com/fcc-fines-operator-of-gps-jammer-that...
Very cheap/easy to flood an area with noise.