My only complaint with it is that they use the acronym UCL without defining it.
In this context it would be either "expand" or "explicitate" (because the operators thought the meaning was so obvious that leaving it implicit was enough).
We can argue if that’s a good or bad decision, but it seems to be intentional.
It’s not as famous as MIT but still known to anyone in academia and most in the anglosphere.
They are just "LIM" now. A former acronym, reduced to a mononym.
The trend to be meaningless is a confusing decision to me. Guess it's a good thing that's not my department
> by University College London
Therefore repetition may not be necessary.