Also seems relatively clear that he started his first company in the US while on a visa that did not allow that, thus breaking immigration law as well.

Ukrainian army wanted geofence to be lifted, their attack wasn't sabotaged like the rumor mill framed it. Starlink was not, at that point, party to a contract with the state department that gave them permission to provide uplinks to IEDs. They do now, for what it's worth (via "starshield"). Imagine whatever company you work at getting a call asking for an extra license immediately because they need it to bomb North Korea, you might say, hold on while I get legal on the phone.

I don’t remember the Ukraine being the same nation as the United States but maybe I missed some movement on Twitter.

[delayed]

Funny how people on twitter claim 'treason' but somehow the DoD disagrees. Who should we trust with this one I wonder.

The story as popularly told was simply inaccurate. I suggest you do some more research.

A US funded military strike that didn't fund his receivers in full in a location where the US government didn't want it's weapons used and is still illegal today to provide services to?

Is that your requirement for someone to be a NAZI ?