They lost literally tens of millions in grant opportunities that I have written and the experience I bring, because they wouldn't go remote 3 days instead of just 2.
I understand wanting some time in person, absolutely. I hate it, but it does make certain processes much easier. But to not negotiate at all, even when the candidate is perfect for the job and happy with everything else? Ridiculous.
Apparently I should've asked specifically about the role? Even though we were already talking about that role?
> I asked about remote and was told the company was up to 4 days a week remote.
Wait, do they work 7 days a week?
If that's their attitude (and I've seen companies where it is), that's a huge red flag.
They said they were remote 4 out of 5 days. But the specific department is only remote 2 of the 5 days for that position.
I'm not sure how else to say what I'm saying. My qualifications are literally perfect for the job. My experience is perfect for the job. My location is perfect for the job. My attitude is perfect for the job.
It was billed as remote up to four days but the department head only allows 3. That was a deal breaker. I legitimately only negotiated on that. I was willing to take a pay and title cut because I agree with the mission of the institution.
It seemed like a no brainer to me.