Teslas Are Involved in More Fatal Accidents Than Any Other Brand, Study Finds
gizmodo.com
gizmodo.com
–––
“Most of these vehicles received excellent safety ratings, performing well in crash tests at the IIHS and NHTSA, so it’s not a vehicle design issue” [1]
“The models on this list likely reflect a combination of driver behavior and driving conditions, leading to increased crashes and fatalities.” [1]
- Karl Brauer, iSeeCars Executive Analyst
[1] The 23 Most Dangerous Cars On The Road
1 Hyundai Venue
2 Chevrolet Corvette
3 Mitsubishi Mirage
4 Porsche 911
5 Honda CR-V Hybrid
6 Tesla Model Y
7 Mitsubishi Mirage G4
8 Buick Encore GX
9 Kia Forte
10 Buick Envision
This looks like the sort of data you'd expect to see if there was absolutely no correlation whatsoever between the class of vehicle and accident rates. And then the data was massaged to put Tesla in the headline because clickbait — and even after that massaging, Tesla was pretty much tied with Kia. So what have we learned from this data? Nothing. It's meaningless data. Might as well be random.I was walking down the road, beside me a young man with airpods on. He was walking on a side lane which is intended for parking lots. Suddenly, a Tesla was driving behind him with about the same speed, but at a distance of less than 10cm behind him.. forcing him off the street. He didn't hear or see the car.
So, how stupid a driver must be to drive that close behind a walking one?
It's Tesla drivers. In Germany I saw that kind of behavior more than once.
That's why a good driver in public is a smooth and predictable one, not one who can just parallel park with 2 cm space in one go every time.
I looked at the Tesla driver, then the pedestrian noticed something is wrong and then noticed the Tesla, too, and left the lane.
This is a very risky and reckless driving behavior. I've seen such behavior from young guys wanting to impress or some stupid drivers with fast cars who things the roads are belong to them. The Tesla driver was about 50y old.
I've should have made a video and post it here. No one believes me :)
Ok..
It's obviously not true that "adaptive cruise control or FSD" could explain your anecdote. Adaptive cruise does not engage in a Tesla unless the road is marked and painted. FSD is not available in Germany. Even if it was, it's far too cautious around pedestrians, it wouldn't allow itself to get within 1 metre of a pedestrian let alone 0.1 metres.
It's also obviously not true that "Tesla used" anything, because the car in your anecdote was owned and operated by a (presumably) licensed driver and not by Tesla.
A better hypothesis for your anecdote is that the driver was French and not that driving a Tesla vehicle somehow reprograms human brains to drive dangerously.
It's the same question like who buy's a BMW or a Mercedes Benz? There's a special type of people the different car makers are aiming at. The same applies to Tesla drivers.
In Germany, where a lot of discussion around cars is happening, just a special type of people buy Tesla.
The report makes precisely the opposite claim. It says small cars have a higher rate of fatal accidents. From the report:
"When broken out by size, small cars have the highest fatal accident rate while midsize and full-size cars are both below average. While modern small cars benefit from the latest engineering and safety tech, they still have a size and weight disadvantage in accidents with a larger vehicle."[0]
Perhaps you are right and weight is a critical factor, but then you'll need to explain why the heavy Model S was lower in their rankings than the Toyota Prius. It should also be noted that Tesla vehicles are generally lighter than most comparable EVs, and typically 0–10% heavier than comparable ICE cars.
I contend that this report is junk data. The authors haven't published the statistics (or methodology for collecting the statistics) used to normalise the raw NHTSA FARS data. Without it, its conclusions are as useless as you might suspect when looking at their top 23 list. (I wonder... if we knew what the 24th car was, would we know more about the motivations of the authors?)
That the only automaker name in the headlines stemming from this report is Tesla is proof that there's no intellectual integrity associated with its dissemination — it's just vibe, and an opportunity for people to push their pet explanations, even when the report itself contradicts them. Or when the pet explanation doesn't make sense of literally any data point.
[0] https://www.iseecars.com/most-dangerous-cars-study#v=2024
From what I've been able to find it looks like non-hybrid CR-Vs are around average. So what is it that specifically makes the hybrid have such a high rate?