Pinboard Turns Three
blog.pinboard.in
blog.pinboard.in
This was just recently when Maciej just gave away the schema to the site! [2] I'm still reeling from the awesomeness of that move..
[1] http://shrik.theswamp.in/2012/07/youre-doing-it-right.html
[2] http://blog.pinboard.in/2012/06/do_it_yourself_bookmarking/
Shortly after setting up the pinboard account, I moved the personal Web site off Wordpress back to static html. Pinboard provides the microblogging thing the way I like to do it.
http://idlewords.com/2009/09/how_to_not_get_your_blog_hacked...
(I don't use a local WordPress, huge overhead, I just use a few bash scripts).
Are your scripts online somewhere? As the creator of "frankenstein's ___.sh"[1] I am always looking at ways to improve it, mostly by peeking at other people's code.
Perfect? Of course not. More than good enough? Yes.
Try it.
Now, admittedly, he's probably not getting rich off of the site – the exact number of paying users is hard to discern, but there are 7k more active users now than a year ago, so assuming 50% of people who buy in use it at least once every 30 days, then, conservatively, he's grossed somewhere north of 100k in the last year, right? Even if that's off by a factor of 2, it's not a killing – but it's real money as costs are likely reasonably low given the content he's serving and the low overhead such a small operation would require.
On top of that are the $25/year archival accounts. If 5% of all active users pay for archival accounts (that's a utter guess), that grosses another ~$29k/year. That's workable, definitely... but again, not a killing.
It looks like since I joined a couple years ago user acquisition has slowed down a bit, and the cost of operations might have gone up per active user.
2011 bookmarks/active user = 27M/16k = 1688 per user
2012 bookmarks/active user = 53M/23k = 2304 per user
2011 bytes archived/active user = 3.0T/16k = 197 megabytes per user
2012 bytes archived/active user = 5.9T/23k = 269 megabytes per user
2011 unique URLs/active user = 16M/16k = 1000 per user
2012 unique URLs/active user = 32M/23k = 1391 per user
% rate of change over previous year %
2011 2012
23.5M 26M bookmarks
65M 59M tags
13.2K 7K active users
2.8TB 2.9TB bytes archived
23h -7h downtime
13.5M 16M unique URLs
Pinboard is nice, but sadly, as much as I like it or admire its founder, I can't recommend it. Just because of the uptime. I don't think I'm a heavy user (have around 120 bookmarks since joining in March), however two times I couldn't save a bookmark because Pinboard was down.
This led to my realization that 1) the primary purpose of bookmark manager is to allow user to quickly save the page and forget about it, so uptime matters, although I took it for granted before, and that 2) reliability is (maybe the only) one nice thing about free services owned by a large faceless corporations.
(It's not that bad if it's down when I try to access my bookmarks. If I were making my own bookmarking service, I'd probably make bookmarklet as independent as possible from the rest of the architecture.)
You have to add the $25/year archival users to that number too.
I personally use evernote. Works well enough
Add the post-by-email email address to your contact list, then use the Send To button in Mobile Safari, type "p-i" and touch the pinboard completion.