> What I don’t get it is how you can be a programmer in the year twenty twenty-four and not be the tiniest bit curious about a technology that’s said to be fundamentally changing how we’ll program in the future.

I don't use it because I don't find it useful. Not sure why that's hard to understand.

> Absolutely, yes, that claim sounds ridiculous — but don’t you want to see for yourself?

Well, I did see for myself. If the situation changes in the future and genAI becomes useful to me, I'll find out in the natural course of things. Until/unless that day comes, I'm not using it. Lack of curiosity doesn't enter into it.

> Maybe that assumption was wrong

I don't think that assumption was wrong. I think the wrong assumption is that some devs don't want to use AI features due to a lack of curiosity or willingness to learn.