What Really Makes Us Fat?
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
Here's an experiment you can run on yourself. Eat the same diet as you are now, but less of it. Take up alternate day fasting, or just skip a meal every day. Be rigorous - keep track of how much your eat, and eat less than you were. Do it for a couple of months.
You will, absolutely, definitely, without a doubt, lose weight, largely adipose tissue mass.
Everything else is either (a) discussion of nutritional quality with regard to what you are eating, which is a rat-hole that never ends and you will never do better than a good 80/20 result no matter how much time and energy you spend on it or (b) the self-delusion of people who don't want to give up their capacious eating habits.
Considering vitamins and minerals most people eat crap. Deficiencies are fairly rampant. The problem is that grains/beans, dairy, potato, and oils are good for energy but have very lousy nutrient profiles. People are eating an energy dense but nutrient light diet that is a vestige of times of hard manual labor.
And a lot cheaper to produce
The single most important element to not getting fat is identifying yourself and then eating appropriately.
Are you a couch potato? Then YES, you need to restrict carb content.
Are you an athelete? Go ahead and eat carbs, but eat them AT THE RIGHT TIME (meaning, post workouts* mostly). And eat the right ones (high GI immediately post heavy lifting session, lower GI later in the day (generally speaking)).
Protein is your friend. Make sure all meals have it. Eat lots of veggies, mostly green. Drink lots of water. Limit chemical consumption (most diet sodas spike insulin...might as well be eating a candy bar).
Getting more specific is going to really depend on our goals. This is critically important. If you can state what your goal is, it is REALLY EASY to understand how to eat, workout and live to meet those goals...but if you don't know the goal, you'll flounder.
For instance, to lose weight:
Restrict carbs for 6.5 days in a week. Do a carb refeed on the 7th night. Eat only protein, fat and veggies (think eggs, bacon and broccoli) when you restrict the carbs. You'll lose tons of weight and retain the muscle. To put this in to high gear, do a HIIT sprint session on day 1 and 2 to completely deplete your glycogen stores.
To gain weight (muscle):
Before you workout, water, protein, fat and veggies. After you workout (heavy weight workout), protein, carbs and veggies. Carbs stimulate insulin, shuttling nutrients to muscles, helping them grow.
There are TONS of tweaks to each of these if you are having trouble (like, for instance, add milk if you are still having trouble gaining weight or add some light cardio if you are having trouble losing weight), but the basics are the above.
I love this stuff....
* btw..when I say "workout", I mean heavy weight workouts (barbell etc). There is something special about the way it stimulates your body that high rep bodyweight workouts just can't do. Bodyweight workouts have their place, but they should be used for a very specific goal...
You should be getting about 1g/lbs of body mass a day, which is nearly 2x the recommended intake by the FDA. If you eat that much protein you're going to have a really hard time feeling hungry enough to stuff your face with carbs.
Where do you draw the line for "high rep"? Are you talking >8? >12? >20?
I'm just thinking: is there a difference between doing 8-12 reps for 3 sets & 4-6 reps (don't know how many sets I should if I do lower reps)?
http://archive.mensjournal.com/everything-you-know-about-fit...
Basically:
- Low Reps / Set = Strength / Power
- Med Reps / Set = Mass
- High Reps / Set = Endurance / "tone"
See these two charts for a little more detail:
- http://i.imgur.com/vZ7pU.jpg
- http://i.imgur.com/4NVGh.jpg
FTA:
"...it all starts with understanding the four basic muscular aptitudes: strength, power, muscle mass, and muscular endurance. Strength means how much you can lift once, and it’s the backbone of every sport on Earth, from the crouch-holding power of a skier to the one-finger pull-up of a climber. Power is a more slippery term that means “speed strength,” or how much you can lift very, very quickly, and it gives you the explosive paddling speed to catch a big wave or the pedaling burst to fire your mountain bike up a grade. Muscle mass can be a liability in sports like climbing, where it’s all about strength-to-weight ratio, but mass helps enormously with games like rugby and football, and it can support strength and power — not to mention make you look better in a T-shirt. Muscular endurance means how many times you can lift a given weight in a row without stopping, and it’s the essence of running, swimming, and even a kayaker’s long-haul paddling. As for your training sessions themselves, the number one thing to remember is that each of the Fundamental Four responds to a different number of repetitions per set. Lift a weight so heavy you can lift it only once, you’re building strength (and, oddly, not much mass); lift a weight you can move six to 12 times, you’re building mass (and, oddly, a little less pure strength); ease up to a weight you can lift 50 times, and you’re working muscular endurance (which is great for endurance sports but tends to undermine the first three, shrinking your strength, power, and muscle size)."
It seems females only have to go one direction -> be skinny whereas for males we need to somehow add muscle (for which the general advice is eat a lot of food specifically protein) and lose fat. Those seem very contradictory in my mind though I know little about nutrition.
Why the difference? Well, losing fat is mostly about discipline whereas gaining muscle is about discipline and very, very hard work.
I find doing things much easier than constantly not doing things.
I'm around a fair number of fat people and I don't need any nutritional science background to notice they eat very often and they eat a lot. I suppose there's clinical evidence that low carb diets work, but it pretty much seems to me the main factor is these people just don't care about being fat slobs.
Also obesity has been an issue for middle aged wealthy people for at least the last few thousand years. Which suggest's people tend to eat more when they can afford to do so.
Consuming the same number of calories with different consumptions led to different amounts of calories being burned, and different amounts of weight being gained.
TLDR: what you eat matters, it's not just how much.
They are saying it in the technical sense that the people did in fact burn more calories on different diets. But those calories being burned were caused by the change in diet (assuming the hypothesis is correct). That is a massive change in American nutrition theory.