That is interesting there must be a definite business case to go on with the moral decision.
The interesting point for me will be when websites remove specific Twitter metadata instead of Open graph.
The interesting point for me will be when websites remove specific Twitter metadata instead of Open graph.
tl;dr - Twitter is bad, and also not as important as it used to be. The Guardian does not want to and is not financially forced into producing clickbait for social media.
(The Guardian is owned by a weird non-profit, the Scott Trust (which is, confusingly, no longer a trust); it's allowed the odd principled decision, as a treat.)