Cornish monument is 4k years older than was thought and 'without parallel' | Hacker News Reader

Cornish monument is 4k years older than was thought and 'without parallel'

theguardian.com

54 pointszeristor14 comments

I think 'without parallel' is an exaggeration.

The Kennet Long Barrow is similar age, shape and construction:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Kennet_Long_Barrow

Similar barrows exist across southern England, and in the wider Atlantic coast region, from Spain to Brittany and Ireland:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotswold-Severn_Group

The only unusual about King Arthur's Hall is the apparent absence of burial chambers.

I'm an American and my last name is Kinnett, I've often wondered if I have ancestry going back to this place? Doubtful but fun to think about.

This cluster of surnames lead back to the Roman settlement Cunetio, now Mildenhall, the River Kennet, and a Celtic word for "dog".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cunetio

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_Kennet

That's assuming yours isn't from something unrelated such as Kinnettles in Scotland.

>That's assuming yours isn't from something unrelated such as Kinnettles in Scotland

unrelated, you mean, to Mildenhall in Suffolk, because isn't a word from Cornwall more like than that to be related to a Celtic language name?

I meant unrelated to "Kennet". We seemed to be talking about West Kennet long barrow by this point.

I'm not sure which two of the three things (Kinnettles, Mildenhall, and Cornish names) you're comparing. If you're saying it's outrageous to find a Celtic place name in Suffolk, you're right, except this is a name from Roman times, when Romans were Romanizing Brittonic Britons and the Anglo-Saxons hadn't yet got a look in. And river names tend to be the oldest names and full of debated and unexplained elements, such as the "Or" in Orwell, and the Ouse.

Yeah, I'm from Ireland and Newgrange[1] was the first thing that came to my mind when I read this.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newgrange

Australian aboroginal artifacts date back 10000s of years but not sure if they have something like these rock structures from that long ago. But I wouldn't be suprised.

Do archaeologists or other relevant experts have any sense of how common these things were / what fraction have been destroyed either through natural processes or human activity? Are there a smallish number of these sites because they were always rare (and took a lot of labor to build) or were there a lot more of these but like a lot of them were deconstructed by iron age farmers or something?

Why does the OP say it's 'without parallel'?

The article says it's "without parallel", quoting the lead archaeologist.

I think that's assumed in the GGP and GP comments. The GP asks, 'why do they say that'?

Is “the monument” visible on the picture at top of the article?

To paraphrase Sheldon’s joke - Archeology is a science of “what did I just trip over”.

I am joking. Enjoy your cornish wonder of the world :)

But it's Cornish

Someone paid a Cornish builder to work on their patio, this is how far he got. I'm sure he'll finish it dreckly.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com