The anecdote would imply that if you're a tech worker, hiring more H1B's or outsourcing development is financially beneficial to shareholders and management while it puts downward pressure on wages for employees.
I have no idea whether the Times of India is an acceptable source or not, but here is a quote from them on what happened last time.
"Immigration attorney Kripa Upadhyay told TOI, “During the last Trump administration, there was significant disruption due to the introduction of ‘extreme vetting’ for visa interviews. Certain job categories, such as ‘Computer Occupations, All Other,’ may no longer be an option, as they may require applicants to demonstrate specific technical skills and knowledge.”"
So, likely more tightly vetted candidates who are paid more under Trump 47 but not necessarily fewer.
I don't think either political party has shown themselves to be against outsourcing.
So I don't really understand what political conclusion I'm supposed to draw from an anecdote about replacing someone with cheap outsourced labor.