> Also there's a chance for this article to be an input for various llms, thus increasing the confusion in the future.
Sounds good. Anybody who uses LLM output without any understanding of their own deserves it.
Sounds good. Anybody who uses LLM output without any understanding of their own deserves it.
LLM output will be used at places beyond your control and then information coming from it will be placed as legitimate, because people generally don't care about the outcomes of their actions. So talking about which individual deserves what is IMO misleading; we, as society, don't deserve such sh*t in general.