That's what worries me, the easiness with which we label one as enemy, and assume the other one being normal.
That's what worries me, the easiness with which we label one as enemy, and assume the other one being normal.
The issue here is that TikTok was allowing its offices to act on behalf of the CCP in opposition to Canadian interests. If we discover Google is running anti Canadian CIA ops we would have an issue with that as well.
The difference is presumably that Canada is happy to have google collect data since google is happy to cooperate with CSIS.
What you're pointing out is peanuts (in practice, and overblown in news) compared to your southern neighbour spying and meddling, so why are things that would be very minor such a huge issue?
How many people are forgetting those basics will never cease to surprise me.
So, effectively, it seems like US voters have the same amount of influence on their intelligence services' spying, both domestic and international, than citizens of China do.
Long story short, "spying becomes tolerable when the country doing it is a democracy" is definitely not something I agree with, at least not in the democractic setups we see in the west (and that includes Europe, to be clear).
I'm not defending what the US has done, but compromising elected officials in the House of Parliament is not 'peanuts' by any measure, and it is something that China has done, and the US hasn't.
I also have never said that what the US is doing is acceptable.
If Google opened offices that were a CIA front posing a national security risk, I would expect them to be shown the door as well. From what I understand, the reason Bytedance had their offices shut down was because they were acting as a front for the CCP.
Imagine believing there would be something as powerful as Tiktok and it wouldn't be used for propaganda purposes.
It is just boring agreeing with these morons at this point. Let them live in their dream world as they pretend to be smart. Sheep are easy to herd.
The only naivety I see is assuming this is any different in our media (legacy or web based), especially when we have multiple evidence of the contrary on our own platforms.