Equally bad incentives apply to smaller ("alternative") media outlets right wingers consume.
They also shilled for Trump relentlessly, without pretense. But that's beside the point. The left should accept that they no longer represent the aspirations and priorities of the mainstream or even of ethnic minorities, and the right should stop with the underdog charade. They've swapped sides. Of course, neither side will make that admission anytime soon.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_media_endorsements_in_t...
Articles like these are predictable and a meme
https://www.axios.com/2024/11/05/presidential-election-newsp...
The bias is calling him an agent of russia, a fascist, a dictator, a nazi, and a threat to democracy for 8 years
It's calling him crazy about Hydroxychloroquine and then 6 months later saying the same thing
The bias is blatantly miss quoting him with what he said about Liz Cheney
The bias is only fact checking one candidate in a debate
The bias is associating a trump rally where Israeli flags were flying in MSG with a nazi rally in the 30s
The bias is suggesting that we are suppose to think he wants to put his daughter in a gas chamber who converted to judaism
Then there's the work of Robert Epstein: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Epstein%20Tes...
So who is saying you're supposed to think that, actually?
And you actually think they're important enough to pay any attention to?