Samsung profits surge 79% boosted by smartphone sales
bbc.co.uk
bbc.co.uk
"Samsung Shares Fall After Quarterly Sales Miss Estimates"
That's a tough spin on positive news. Just because the analysts blew their estimates doesn't mean Samsung had a bad quarter. Here is the key quote:
"Sales of 47 trillion won ($41 billion) trailed the 49.8 trillion-won average of 35 analysts’ estimates compiled by Bloomberg, overshadowing operating profit that rose to a record."
Samsung is supposed to give the analysts "guidance" to let them make good estimates. So it's a little bit Samsung's fault.
If Samsung was the only source of information, then you would be correctly. But they aren't, and even if they were, investors would make "bets" that were either more optimistic or pessimistic than what later information supported.
Consider the source: people reading Bloomberg probably do want to know what's going on with the share price moreso then a general or tech news source reader where the focus might remain on the raw numbers.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-05/samsung-2nd-quarter...
(I'm not sure if sfgate.com edits content they re-publish.)
> A story in Nassim Taleb’s The Black Swan illustrates this automatic search for causality. He reports that bond prices initially rose on the day of Saddam Hussein’s capture in his hiding place in Iraq. Investors were apparently seeking safer assets that morning, and the Bloomberg News service flashed this headline: U.S. TREASURIES RISE; HUSSEIN CAPTURE MAY NOT CURB TERRORISM. Half an hour later, bond prices fell back and the revised headline read: U.S. TREASURIES FALL; HUSSEIN CAPTURE BOOSTS ALLURE OF RISKY ASSETS. Obviously, Hussein’s capture was the major event of the day, and because of the way the automatic search for causes shapes our thinking, that event was destined to be the explanation of whatever happened in the market on that day. The two headlines look superficially like explanations of what happened in the market, but a statement that can explain two contradictory outcomes explains nothing at all. In fact, all the headlines do is satisfy our need for coherence: a large event is supposed to have consequences, and consequences need causes to explain them.
Should my car manufacturer switch to square steering-wheels for better differentiation?
When an UI works well then by all means copy it. Apple should not be allowed to hold back an entire industry just because they happened to be the first to come up with a sensible icon-layout for touchscreen-devices.
I think you're the one being incredulous/insincere here.
Samsung's success (and their past means of achieving it) is nothing to be proud of.
Not that it would make much difference, but it is crazy to see all the geeks embracing them so much.
To paraphrase Beatrice Hall: "I disapprove of what you do, but I will defend to the death your right to be free from patent abusers".
Anyone but Apple.
I am personally trying to avoid their products, they don't deserve any kind of admiration whatsoever.
They also form part of the supply chain for most of their competitors so they can gain an information advantage.
In the TV market I think where they really took the lead in product development was with the ability to redesign the panel packaging to use it as structure for the TV and then to design for thinner a thinner bezels.
Wow, sounds like another company I've heard of...
How about Microsoft? They've done alright.
And certainly there are other cases where OSS blazes the trail. But copycat software gets a hall pass when it you get to download it for free? Or is your post just a different iteration on the iOS/Android fanboy-ism?
(1) Hard not to focus on the one being shoved at the camera.
(2) Display models held by display models don't just "happen" to be configured a certain way. Samsung has frequently marketed their stuff with the app drawer although lawsuits have mitigated that lately.*
Given the lack of differentiation with Samsung products compared to other Android vendors your suggestion that this is all a big coincidence is laughable.
* see for example...
original galaxy s announcement:
http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2012/01/medium_af88...
galaxy tab original packaging:
http://www.thegalaxytab.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/galax...
galaxy tab 2 launch event:
http://img.ibtimes.com/www/data/images/full/2011/10/04/16859...