BYD added a Tesla-worth of production capacity over the past 3 months
cleantechnica.com
cleantechnica.com
Is it? At this point I’ve driven electric Audis and BMWs, VWs, Kia’s and also BYDs.
While the BYDs are certainly cars and are also relatively affordable compared to other options (of course it’s impossible to compare a BYD car to a BMW), it is not a very nice car in my experience.
Wether or not that is enough of a difference to sway consumer sentiment remains to be seen, but I don’t think it is as over as you make it out to be.
I think the biggest advantage from cars not from china are, that they are not from china.
No Huawei risk. No dead car in a major escalation.
Cars have gotten too smart and too connected for me to feel safe with a direct control line to Peking. (I also don't feel safe with a control line to Musk's HQ)
The real problem is that legacy car makers’ EVs are all high-mid/luxury cars.
People just want a Honda Civic that takes them from point A to point B.
The Renault Megane E Tech is a also a pretty cool vehicle hitting the same pricepoint (haven't driven that one yet tho). Citroen is also hitting very accessible pricepoints with their E3 starting at 23k MSRP
In addition to the spark EV, Fiat 500 EV, etc these are all no longer sold here. You might be able to pick one up used.
We could considered the Chinese cars as cheap, but we are than comparing the cost of a price-dumped car from China, to a slightly overpriced car from Germany.
The outlier here is considering a 10k€ car something normal. 10 years ago I would have argued yes, but after the inflation wave of the last few years, that is no longer a reality.
The problem for many consumers, and France is a good example of this, is that the salaries haven't followed. The second problem for France is that a large part of the population is stuck in minimum-wage or close to minimum-wage salaries, putting those goods out of reach as their prices increase with inflation. (Leaving the debate about whether the price increase is the cause or the consequence of inflation aside)
Only if these cars are only intended for the affluent. Then sure. It's totally the right place for them. But I thought the point of EVs was saving our environment. What's the point if only a small fraction of any given population can afford one?
what constitute "nice"? from all of the reviews i've seen, they're well built. The common misconception that chinese electronics products are made cheap and poorly is no longer true today (hasn't been true for the past decade).
I also enjoy being comfortable while doing so. Meaning sitting nice, good climate control, no bad smells, good sound isolation, ... being able to use the trunk.
Also a "nice" car also drives nice. If I like driving a car, it means I can handle it better - which is critical in critical situations - to not get hurt.
You drive less than 30 kilometers every day so who gives a shit really?
It's a repeat of the emergence of Japanese car manufacturers in the eighties. The same dynamics are at play here: the Chinese products are simply better and cheaper. And contrary to the popular believe that's not just subsidies. Those foreign factories in Turkey, Mexico, and elsewhere will be producing low cost vehicles. The cost difference is the competitive advantage Chinese companies now have. They might have gotten there via subsidies but now that they have this cost advantage, it's there to stay. To compete, other companies will have to address their cost issues and their R&D deficit. There's no way around it. Producing more costly vehicles is just going to continue to price them out of the market.
Delay tactics don't work. Tariffs don't work. Delaying investments, doesn't work either. That about sums up the current attitude of a lot of the legacy companies. Dragging their feet, reducing investments, and lobbying for tariffs to protect their businesses. To survive, they would need to reverse their strategy and shift all effort towards producing low cost EVs. There's plenty of demand. But not for overpriced products.
They’re also extremely slow to react, and can’t fathom that people don’t really want what they’ve been selling the last couple of decades, they just didn’t have an alternative. Now they do.
The loss of the USA as a market would would be harmful, but is it assumed that all western countries would follow?
Or they build local.
eg:
Mitch McConnell, senior United States senator from Kentucky since 1985, the longest serving senator in his state's history. McConnell has been the leader of the Senate Republican Conference since 2007, including as majority leader from 2015 to 2021, making him the longest serving Senate party leader in U.S. history.
> after 2 consecutive terms.Even for POTUS it's a two term, under ten year total limit, doesn't have to be consectutive terms.
BYD is already in Japan, but it's quite limited. China has shadow-banned Korean automaker Hyundai/Kia since 2017 (THAAD) and battery makers LG, Samsung, SK since 2016 -- not sure if China would be warmly received there.
south americans, the african continent, just to name a few.
> it's difficult to find infrastructure to support EVs.
sure, but it doesn't mean it won't get built. What if china goes all in, and do the belt-and-road initiative v2, and build out those countries' infrastructure (and conveniently eliminate the soft power that the US would have there, such as financial power)?
China has no real "defense" against financial power of the US (vis a vi sanctions), but they're surely doing something about it. And given the CCP's long term planning (for which they can, since they're authoritarian and don't need to cater for an election every few years), they can press for policies that play out long term.
EV infra and is a lot easier to realize than importing/refining oil. Electricity can be generated in a variety of ways and, oh, hey, China is exporting that also.
Until every WalMart, Target, 7-11, and government agency have charging stations on 1/3 of their parking lot, public EV vehicles are a pipe dream.
Detroit is, sadly, calling this 100% correctly. There is no point in doing heavy public EV rollouts until there is a demonstrated political will to roll out the charging infrastructure.
Tesla was importing CATL's LFP prior to the tariff, but recently dropped it altogether after the tariff became effective.
For example, Musk pledged his commitment to China's core socialist values: https://www.mediaite.com/news/elon-musk-signs-letter-pledgin...
Musk advocates for Taiwan's submission to China: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/oct/08/elon-musk...
Musk decried California's covid measures as "fascist": https://www.theverge.com/2020/4/29/21242102/elon-musk-corona...
But praised China because "Shanghai's COVID-19 measures helped lay the foundation for the city's future development" even though they were stricter than California's: https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-...
And there's also what he doesn't do.
Musk is very keen on criticizing the US and other governments. But can you find for me a single criticism of the Chinese government from Musk? I'd like to see one.
There's no point trying to be a mind reader. It doesn't matter what he claims to care about. What matters is what he does.
They don't have to, they choose to. Oligarchs usually submit to authoritarians because profit comes before principle. They get their short term gain and others will have to pay the long term cost.
when a push comes to a shove, the goal of electrification of cars can be merely postponed. climate change is a far-off future problem, where as geopolitical rivalry and such are close-by problems.
US tariffs keep BYD cars out for now. BYD doesn't really try to sell in the US. Just the rest of the world.
> Last fall in Malta, BYD began selling the Atto 3, an all-electric compact crossover. Strip away the company’s futuristic logo, and it looks almost indistinguishable from other small, sporty SUVs. But inside it’s full of treats, including heated seats in vegan leather and a 360-degree rotating touchscreen. The 60-kilowatt-hour battery gives it a range of 260 miles, enough to circle Malta’s main island twice. And by European standards, it’s inexpensive, at about $28,000. It’s a novelty in Malta. But the real reason BYD is entering the European Union’s tiniest member state? The company’s happy place is emerging markets and countries with no domestic auto industry to defend: “You can basically describe them as a ‘chicken rib market,’ ” says Yu Zhang, the managing director of consulting firm AutoForesight in Shanghai. “All the chicken ribs added up together, it’s more than 10 million cars.”
> After increasing its annual sales in China 15 times over, to 3 million cars in only three years, BYD is now exporting to roughly 95 markets, including 20 new ones this year. The company is building, has recently opened or has announced plans for assembly plants outside China in 10 countries on three continents. The speed and scope of this expansion have caught the global auto industry off guard and triggered protectionist tariffs in the US and EU, where policymakers fear Chinese players such as BYD will, in the words of Elon Musk, “demolish” their domestic automakers.
I can't help but feel this is a very shortsighted strategy for buyers. The world is pretty unstable at the moment, and throwing a huge industry in the hands of China for the sake of getting a cheaper/bigger ("I want MORE for LESS") car, seems awfully risky.
It also seems to be in direct contradiction with the whole nationalist agenda that is sweeping across the west these days...
The European and Amrican car manufacturers are full of them self and want to sell premium vehicles to rich people. That is the fundamental problem. Covid gave them hubris.
Buying a chinese car means that you directly support the chinese regime, and that you directly undermine a "local" European competitor.
But if you're fine with that, and you just want the "biggest car for the least amount of money", you do you.
Ultimately though, even the "Detroit" automakers decamped, first from the cities themselves to the suburbs, then to nonunion states in the South, and finally to Mexico and overseas. Meanwhile, foreign automakers invest heavily in their North American facilities.
There's nobody keying Hondas in the high school parking lot during home games anymore.
The point is that, no matter how much we want locally made cars, and to take pride in the work and industry of our neighbors and countrymen, we can't impact this as consumers. Moralize all you like about your car purchase, but your behavior one way or another won't stand in the way of transnational capital flows.
... added production capacity of nearly 200,000 vehicles per month from August to October of this year. The capacity addition of nearly 2.4 million vehicles over the course of a year is greater than Tesla’s total annualized global production (469,796 units in the 3rd quarter multiplied by four equals 1,879,184 units).
I'm a bit confused.. from Aug to Oct, or 3 month x 200,000 = 600,000, not 2.4M in additional capacity. What am I missing here? Perhaps Larry meant "total capacity?"Maybe the geopolitical situation will make the car lobby industry less powerful.
Even at a 50% markup over what they sell at in China, it'd be unstoppable.
https://www.businesskorea.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=...
Trump is not the most predictable guy on policy and they seems to be waiting to see what will happen in real legislation, not just in campaign speeches.
I find it surprisingly hard to get some insight on how Chinese companies are doing on that front. The only thing I find is a few videos of western journalists who do a single ride somewhere in China.
Does anyone know about sources to get a better insight on how Chinese companies are doing in terms of self-driving software development?
Amusingly, the Ford Transit commercial van is cheaper in electric than in gas-powered. But on the consumer product side, there's still a big price premium for electric, and you usually have to get an excessive 'trim level'.
Stellantis screwed up so badly that sales dropped about 40% and the CEO was fired, after collecting the biggest bonus in automotive history for "cutting costs". Betting on "mild hybrids" and extra post-sale fees was a disaster.
Nobody in US automotive is investing in solid state batteries the way BYD and CATL are. There's technical risk, but if those things work, IC cars are over. 9 minute charge and a few hundred miles of range.
This, even if you embargo the new tech, if the new tech is a lot better, it will create a more broad economic disadvantage in not adopting it.
Gas stations are all about location.
There will probably be a business in doing a turnkey conversion. Prepare to bring in heavy power, shut down gas station, remove pumps, remove tanks, clean up and repair convenience store, put in chargers on the islands, replace signage, power up.
This sort of transformative shift rarely happens from within. At least not easily.
Volkswagen basically bet the farm on electric vehicles. They were late to the party, but went all in, so you cannot blame them for trying to block EVs. I rather suspect that making cheap EVs is just extremely difficult if you intend to make a profit. I bet they lost a good sum of money on every eUp! they produced (here in Germany you could get them for 15,000€ at the right time, which is a steal), so they decided to quit producing it, which IMO is a real shame, because it is such a cool car for inner city commuting.
In the future, a car without self-driving software will be as useless as a computer without an operating system. Hardware companies will be at the mercy of software companies. All the margins will be made in software. Hardware already has super thin margins nowadays.
Nokia didn't fail because of the way they made phone hardware.
I don't think Tesla or any other manufacturers have anything to worry about in the US, Canada, and some EU countries since it will be impossible for BYD to sell cars into those markets profitably.
The best user experience is:
You tap a button on your phone
Immediately a car arrives
You enter it
It drives you directly to your destination
You exitIf both are available to you, then no matter how crowded the roads will be, a car that drives you directly from A to B will be the better UX than a bus that drives you from somewhere near A to somewhere near B via C, D, E and F.
So the car could only be the worse experience if it is hard to get one (Because all the cars near you are occupied by other people) while a bus is easy to get into (Because there is one near you and you still fit in).
The vast majority of worldwide rides will continue to be done in individual cars. The extremely crowded situation that would make a bus the better experience is extremely rare. Most rides worldwide are definitely not done in that kind of environment. And the removal of parking spaces and the better routing self-driving cars allow will move even those environments more towards the individual car.