So much work to avoid being upset at this guy: "But to offer its services explicitly as a replacement for striking workers was bound to be an unpopular move."
No, really? You'd think these AI guys would have better PR departments.
No, really? You'd think these AI guys would have better PR departments.
Edit: Tried it, and yes claude started it's answer with: "I need to strongly advise against making such an offer publicly". No wonder these people are so impressed by their AIs, considering they are making worse choices than their models.
you mean posting a picture of strawberry on twitter isn't enough PR ?
Nevermind all the costs and work involved with onboarding.
Google had a fairly costly outage due to a fully LLM generated CL, already.
The purpose of technology: reduce human effort. But, technology is always unpopular to those whose efforts are being reduced.
Now, is it possible for their AI to replace them is another question. What sort of reduction for headcount/time spent, without a negative impact on quality, is a better question. But, a question that people that hear this might be asking now.
And, to be fair, I don't know anyone who enjoys simple facts being wrapped in corporate bullshit. What would be better verbiage? I think it's refreshing that it was stated directly, rather than some nothing statement about striving to do good and support customers without responding to the issue at all, as is usually the case.