What you've described is still a political agenda, albeit one driven by narcissism.
I wonder why my OC was negged. Some liked it, now it’s flat. This down vote thing should be more conversational. It’s like chatting with ghosts.
I don’t think my comment was provocative at all. Only an honest take.
You're the one speaking in absolute terms about Musk's motives and casting aspersions against the character of anyone who disagrees with you. Aggressive arrogance only works around here when you have credentials or evidence to back it up.
And the only difference between being politically motivated and having an agenda is that the latter is the means by which the former is actualized. Musk believing Twitter is infested with a "woke mind virus" is being politically motivated. Musk changing Twitter in ways that he believes will correct that is an agenda. It's quite obvious to anyone that Musk's operating of Twitter is in service to his political beliefs. He certainly isn't doing it to make money.
And, yes, he's also an egomaniac manchild who treats Twitter like his personal sandbox.
Okay, okay! Fair enough!
> And the only difference …
I’m not sure you’re right about that stuff. I think some are more casual (“go with the flow”) on this translation. Others “scheme”. I don’t think Musk is a “schemer”. I think he’s a lost billionaire man child who should stfu and get back to rockets and cars. Rockets and cars! Can you believe this guy? Wtf!