Or just as low level and high level as Interlisp-D at Xerox Parc.
As plenty of other languages.
If you want actual low level code, that is Assembly, and even that depends if the underlying CPU is a pure hardware implementation, or makes use of microcode and is for all practical purposes a mini-interpreter/JIT in hardware.
It’s a bit like a podcast I listened to recently where someone suggested any language with a proper algebraic sum type can be considered a dynamic typed language in some ways. I mean, if you get philosophical about definitions and lean heavily mainly on historical context, it’s possible to say just about anything.
"C Is Not a Low-level Language Your computer is not a fast PDP-11"
https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3212479
Naturally those people will also vouch that an article on the ACM, written by a one of the GCC Objective-C and GNUStep early contributors, and nowadays key researcher on CHERI project isn't something to take into consideration.
Relative to Ruby, an interpreted dynamic language, sure, I will grant you that Go is lower-level, in the sense that you can compile a binary executable from it.
Go also happens to have web server primitives in their standard library and you COULD build a web app with only net/http...