I don’t think they are skeptical of the chip itself. Just asking about the benchmark used.
If I was reviewing cars and used the number of doors as a benchmark for speed, surely I’d get laughed at.
If I was reviewing cars and used the number of doors as a benchmark for speed, surely I’d get laughed at.
Immediately people “but geEk BeNcH”
And then actual people get their hands on the machines for their real workloads and essentially confirm the geekbench results.
If this was the first time, then fair enough. But it’s a Groundhog Day style sketch comedy at this point with M4.
There is a lot to criticize about Apple's silicon design, but they are leading the CPU market in terms of mindshare and attention. All the other chipmakers all feel like they're just trying to follow Apple's lead. It's wild.
But anyway, what is it you see to criticize about Apple‘s Apple Silicon design? The way RAM is locked on package so it’s not upgradable, or something else?
I’m kind of surprised, I don’t hear a lot of people suggesting it has a lot to be criticized for.
It has 4 doors! It’s all over the shitty car news medias. The car is a prototype with only one seat though.