I don't see any reason why people couldn't adjust from meeting friends at restaurants to hosting friends at home instead. (Unless, of course, your living space is limited)
If you aren't cooking and cleaning up after, what's the difference between that and meeting someone at a restaurant?
1) You get out of your house.
2) You don't have leftovers from a big meal to deal with.
3) You can duck out early without having to kick everyone out..
4) you can fit a LOT more people at a restaurant.
I wonder if you realise how dystopian your life already is to consider this question reasonable.
There is a difference between a co-located set of siloed people and a community. The inability to recognise this means your community is already broken.
It’s nice to be able to carry on a conversation somewhere there isn’t a constant din.
If I wanted that, I would go to a bar instead, which is a separate conversation from the one we were having.
However, I don't think I would be so bold as to call either of our lifestyles 'broken'. That feels like a needless attack.
It is accurate, though, and is said with sympathy.