Didn't bother to read the domain and didn't remember the boats name, so I didn't quite understand the title at first. Funnily, it immediately occurred to me, that it must be "that boat", but I half-expected to see some Alex Jones meets Eliezer Yudkowsky attempt to calculate how likely this stuff is to happen using Bayesian inference.
In order to determine the likelihood that the yacht has sunk, we must first examine our priors.
Or A.W.F. Edwards claiming that had it been the Frequentist, the boat wouldn't have sunk.
I was expecting something like "stochastic terrorism", but targeting rich people exclusively in a play on "a rising tide that lifts only yachts".
The one good thing about the sinking of the Bayesian: we can at least update our posteriors.
And I know I'll fail at trying to understand it.
[flagged]
You can't post like this here, and we ban accounts that do, so please don't do it again. You may not owe billionaires better, but you owe this community better if you're participating in it.