If you can’t trust the result of a query how can you trust the check on that query which is itself a query? If no information is trustworthy how do you make progress?
As a basic example: Newton's laws aren't a fact. They're extremely useful approximations; to get a more-complete picture you need relativistic effects, quantum effects, etc.
As a rule of thumb: Fact check in proportion to the cost of a mistake.
Then there’s the other side like Perplexity where they spit out sentences and reference the sources. So they’re being sued because the infringement is obvious.
What is the path to a trustworthy LLM if you’re not allowed to repeat protected data without a legal hurdle?
AGI while a cool idea is irrelevant because that tech does not exist.
I know it hurts