Why is that suprising?
There is no logical reasoning happening, it has no concept of right and wrong, let alone that it can force a specific percentage of wrongness.
There is no logical reasoning happening, it has no concept of right and wrong, let alone that it can force a specific percentage of wrongness.
You tend to get catered responses to whatever role you assign in the prompt. This is well documented. Here's a quick example from search results
https://www.ssw.com.au/rules/give-chatgpt-a-role/
"You are wrong 80% of the time" could be misconstrued as an expected role/command, rather than a mere observation.
> let alone that it can force a specific percentage of wrongness.
Ah, I see what you're saying here. I agree. Maybe I should have said that given the prompt, I'm surprised it doesn't give intentionally incorrect answers (full stop)