Darwin himself noted in the Origin of Species that there is not really any such thing as a "species." It is a poor abstraction we use to describe a group of closely related organisms, but the classifications are necessarily arbitrary and the lines are fuzzy. To visualize this more clearly, imagine that we resurrected every organism that ever lived. It would be easy to say that, say, your cat is felis catus, and so was his father, but scanning back through say, 2^32 ancestors, it would be impossible to point to any ancestor n, compare it with ancestor n + 1, and say this is one species, and that another. Of course, hybridization events make the picture even more complicated. This problem was of course already known at the time, and nothing has changed since, because of the nature of the underlying biological reality.

Thus, there is no distinction at all between "microevolution" and "macroevolution".

This took 30 years.

For Macro, isn't it just longer. 300 years, 3000 years.

How would that be done in a lab to the satisfaction of anybody that would deny evolution to begin with.

There is no experiment that will satisfy people of this because they don't want to know.

Wikipedia has a list of such experiments: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laboratory_experiments_of_spec...

This has been done countless times with Bacteria... Bury your head in the sand as much as you want...