Both Dick Cheney and Bill Gates endorse the Democrats, who (by their actions) endorse the current events.
Or alternatively if we do take it for granted that presidents are quite constrained in what they themself can do (aka "separation of powers"), then why is the original comment talking as if there would be some massive sea change next time when there wasn't one last time?
This seems like another bit of Schrödinger's Trump. Like how he's both the most powerful most successful person, and also just an unfortunate victim that other people are always doing mean things to.
Politicans talk like that they are the same. Probably since pretending there is consent tips the scale in a lot of cases.
But it makes the rest of us that donmt do full time political analysis confused.
Yes, certainly lobbying and policy advocacy don't exist, so there's no actual way to be involved in politics other than holding public office and voting.
>None of this wishy washy treatment that Israel, a U.S ally has received from the current administration.
Providing the bulk of weaponry and auxiliary infrastructure to a country actively engaged in a conflict whilst offering full-throated moral support is 'wishy washy' now.
The support or wishy washyness still amounts to funding the military action that is killing thousands and thousands of civilians.
What more do you want? Even More funding and public forced support of this clear massacre?