> The current Supreme Court has been pretty clear that there is no such thing as settled case law anymore
It's always been the case. That's how Supreme Court works.
See Dobbs and Loper Bright, past precedent previously viewed as solid and well-established is no guarantee of future outcomes with this Court.
Or Brown vs. Board of Education. The courts can change their minds once in a while. There are no indicia that this court wants to overturn the steel cases.
More context? A search on Google doesn't bring anything useful to me.