Journalism and journalists are not supposed to be neutral, but impartial.
Ethics are pretty universal.
Journalism and journalists are not supposed to be neutral, but impartial.
Ethics are pretty universal.
Anyone who has taken a basic philosophy or ethics class or read more than the summary page of their history books knows this is not even remotely true
I at least, am out of patience for sophistry as if this is just a normal and innocent difference of perspective.
You are either with us, or against us.
This is said by both sides, it is equally stupid every time.
If ethics are pretty universal, how is it that one party wants no abortions at all and thinks any abortion that isn't absolutely medically necessary is evil and the other party wants abortions right up until viable birth and thinks that anything less than that is evil?
Especially when considering that most of the world is somewhere in between, where abortions are legal for a few weeks and then illegal unless absolutely necessary.
You’ve got the position of the other party wrong as well, but I’m not going to even bother correcting that because if you don’t find the above completely vile there’s no helping you.