Big Dreams Require Big Thinkers
technori.com
technori.com
With all respect, it was a silly article. Guy decides to say 'Okay' to a higher-ranking officer once in his career (who used to shout or cry like a goddamn child whenever others didn't listen to him), and you magically psycho-analyzed (it's not the word I want to use, but I'm not English and can't think of anything better) him and decided that he's a good fit for his new position at Red Box company (I have no clue whatever the hell that company does). He might be the perfect guy for the job, but how did you conclude that from this short scene?
I just hate when I see posts like this that try to capsulate a human being (that has lived 50+ years, or 1,650,000,000+ seconds) into just one or two brief instances and/or key decisions in their lives.
People are more than the sum of the few key decisions they make (and this wasn't even a key decision).
It just doesn't seem any different from a host of corporate conferences I've help produce. The fact that they got Herbie Hancock shows that this wasn't balls instead of budget.
Even Micheal Jackson likes macs? Working at a popular, high profile tech firm can help when making cold calls?
tx
That in and of itself would be a nice historical story and no takeaway is required. However, if you insist on there being a takeaway, then try this one on for size: don't put artificial limits on what you think is possible. Move forward and make it happen as your assumptions about what is possible and what isn't are probably wrong.
The title of this submission, however, is pretty damn misleading.