This headline is inherently inflammatory (flagged for that reason); the court has not even heard the case yet; and lastly, there are no shortage of good reasons why a court rejecting a new policy should not be interpreted as opposition to the policy.
(My favorite example: If a child is kidnapped, and we know with 100% certainty that child is in a certain neighborhood, who cares about breaking down 100 doors? Are you siding with the kidnappers? Doors can be replaced but children can't, you know!)