Therefore, removing Russian contributors is how these institutions comply with the sanction.
I’m struggling to understand how this is confusing to you. Sanctions place pressure on rogue governments by limiting access to our markets. We either comply with the sanctions or we get fined or worse.
The US also has active sanctions targeting Huawei, but there is a fair number of people in the maintainers list with Huawei e-mails. Double standards much?
UPD: As expected, downwotes is the only response to those questions.
But you're just after whataboutism, since Huawei is decoupling from Linux themselves[1]
[1] https://wccftech.com/huawei-harmonyos-next-to-remove-linux-a...
Well, let me chart it out simply : If you have something you like taken from you, but the captor is deaf to your complaints, you'll complain elsewhere.
The concept here being : If the US state department/BIS/whoever won't consider your plight, maybe your own government will -- and given enough complaints perhaps it will direct their foreign policy to be more in-line with how the rest of the world would like them to play; thus allowing sanctions to be lightened or dropped.
This is essentially the goal behind all sanctioning that isn't directly involved in economic/agricultural/military loss.
The risk , of course, being that it prompts a schism entirely and promotes independence in the sanctioned state, similar to how mcdonalds vs. vkusno & tochka worked out so far.
Go read discussions in the Russian IT communities [1] [2]. The overwhelming reaction is not "let's go overthrow Putin!", but strong negative reaction, loss of respect, and alienation towards Linus, even across those who explicitly against the war and Putin.
[1]: https://habr.com/ru/news/852962/comments/
[2]: https://www.linux.org.ru/news/linux-general/17766938/page3#c...