Taming the buck with a Type III compensator
tomscii.sig7.se
tomscii.sig7.se
A lot of applications are usually tolerant of suboptimal compensator design. I've participated in a few designs where these circuits were plucked from the datasheet reference design and never touched. There's a tradeoff between having a little bit of ringing vs. having an engineer model, tune, and test, and also adding to the BOM complexity with a bunch of different passive part values.
Type I is proportional only.
Type II compensation adds a zero (to increase phase margin [1]) and a pole (to filter high-frequency noise) to the compensation network, resulting in proportional-integral (PI) control.
Type III compensation introduces two zeros and two poles into the control loop, making it a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control scheme.
... and if you want to go one step further, MPC [3] also exists:
https://iaeme.com/MasterAdmin/Journal_uploads/IJARET/VOLUME_...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase_margin
[2] https://eng.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Industrial_and_System...
To go SMT you'll need to add fine-gauge solder wire (0.015"/0.4mm), more flux than you think you need, and either a second iron or soldering tweezers (amazing but expensive). You should add get some T4 paste, a dental pick to spread it, and a "reflow plate" (that means old electric skillet from the secondhand store). And you'll want an inspection microscope but those are really useful in general. That's all you need!
Stop building with dinosaur parts and you can use shiny new things like the LM70660 which can do that entire design in about 1/10th the space and double the reliability: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm70660.pdf