Anybody that thinks Android hasn't brought anything new to the table hasn't really used an Android phone.
Anybody that thinks Android hasn't brought anything new to the table hasn't really used an Android phone.
Not sure who said that anywhere in the discussion, or in the linked article, or anywhere else.
Copying Apple is not really 'innovation'
This implies (to me anyway) the notion that Android does not innovate (aka bringing something new to the table) but merely copies Apple. (I assume that Android is meant here because the original article discusses the mobile sector.)
Let's break this down:
a.) Well is it? Is copying Apple 'innovation'? I'd say no
b.) Did it say that Android is only copying Apple without adding something else? I'd say no
c.) Do you say that Android does in no way copy Apple?
I assume the answer to c.) is also no, so how is this not a straw man argument?