Straight White Male: The Lowest Difficulty Setting There Is
whatever.scalzi.com
whatever.scalzi.com
"Your life is easier because you're white. Feel guilty. Feel sheepish about any of your accomplishments, because they were made easier due to your lack of melanin."
Perhaps this white male – with his lack of melanin – has sun-damaged skin with several large, prominent moles, all of which contribute to his lower self-esteem.
"Your life is easier because you're white. Feel guilty. Feel sheepish about any of your accomplishments, because they were made easier due to your lack of melanin."
People in the past with his same skin color have done bad things, so belittle at him when he complains that it's acceptable and politically correct to be bigoted toward pale people. Call him backwards for feeling resentful and bitter. Remember, you are better than him—his life is easy.
Some people feel powerful and superior when they bash their perceived peers. John Scalzi is one of those people.
[1]: Excuse me—I meant "white trash".
Re-read the article. People do indeed get different numbers of "points" to start with, and the variation within a group is still bigger then differences between the groups, so someone can be black, and yet attractive, physically fit, extremely intelligent and from a wealthy family - a very 'easy' difficulty level to play at, and yet, replace 'black' with 'white' and it will become even easier still.
Being a middle-class white male with loving parents is like playing the game of life on easy mode. One has an obligation to do good things for the world - in acknowledgement that there is more to be done and that others deserve the same environment you were born into. (Paraphrasing)
That's a balanced viewpoint, one that's hard to resent.
Think about it: By many measures, all things being equal, it's actually (institutionally!) easier to be a non-white (non-Asian) male.
The all things being equal qualifier is extremely important, of course—being born white is correlated with being born middle-class with loving parents. But it in-and-of-itself, it does not make things easier.
If you are born black, it's less likely that you will be born middle class, and it's far less likely that you will have loving parents. But that's issue we need to focus on.
Being born white does not make your life easier. Being born middle-class with loving parents does. Love your kids—don't teach them to hate themselves (and their peers) if they're white.
Even if it is, generally speaking, a true statement when applied to the demographic as a whole, individuals will always bristle at such language.
well, get some clicks anyway."
For example, I would guess that gay men have an easier time getting laid. Was that factored in? See also "female privilege" lists like this one: http://www.feministcritics.org/blog/2008/06/08/female-privil...
Is there any point in arguing which faction has it the worst? Let's just help each other out without regard to demographics, eh?
(As the game shifts to technology, I think at least some subset of Asians, at least those with access to the US and global markets, are on easy mode too, and showing up more and more on high score lists.)
For example, I lived in SEAsia for two years. In some places, you cannot own a business (as any foreigner). If you do want to own, you marry (a local) or get yourself a (business) partner. Due to cultural differences, the white male westerner would just not be able to compete with the local.
Living in East Asia, I saw two predominant types of white male westerners, those who tried to eke out a living in E asia (somewhat less educated) and the professionals (typically better educated). There was a third class, and that was hired guns (tantamount to high level consulting).
‡Of equivalent background, education, etc.
(in some cases, sure, a huge security risk too, but they basically assume the white foreigner can solve their problems for them -- at least in Asia, Middle East, etc., which are lacking in white people.)
In the middle east this could cause some serious problems where people from Iraq/Afghanistan assumed any idiot from the US who happened to be white actually knew what he was talking about on any issue. They'd go with a totally uneducated or domain-ignorant white guy giving advice he made up on the spot, over a non-white (local or South Asian) credentialed or highly experienced expert.
In China (and some other places, Thailand, etc.) this leads to hiring white guys to act as public faces for organizations. It's also one of the things international management consulting firms have to rely on in some markets. It's really stupid.
First, most middle easterners are white/caucasian (and classify themselves as such, even if some Americans erroneously might not), so I'm not sure race is a factor. On the other hand, I think power is a big factor. Imagine an alien (ET) race (but humanoid looking) came and took over the US (gov't). Yes, many people would be upset, many would take up arms, but on the other hand, many would assume they had something to offer (as they proved themselves superior militarily). Two, I don't think it's only white Americans they would indulge with this assumption, but rather, any American --not to say they exhibit no racism.
In China, yes, whites are used for company brochures and faces on web presences --but that's token. White guys (and actually, more white girls) are paid pretty low to have their images used for marketing reasons (to appear more international). Conversely, female white-slaves (trafficked peoples from E Europe) do get paid okay, I suppose, vis a vis locals. In most of E Asia, it's Japan that's looked up to and emulated, not so much the US or Europe --altho they are, just less so.
In Africa where China has a large presence and investments, likewise, China is held up to be superior (this also has generated some backlash in those places).