There is no fine print. It is extremely clear and obvious. If you see a term called "Annual paid monthly", 33% less expensive than a monthly option right above, what possible other interpretation can someone have?
There is no fine print. It is extremely clear and obvious. If you see a term called "Annual paid monthly", 33% less expensive than a monthly option right above, what possible other interpretation can someone have?
What the screenshot makes clear is that you'd have to be a single-celled organism to not understand what you're signing up for...
The screen is extremely clear, upfront and even the supposed "fine print" is in huge font with any easy link to learn more.
https://natlawreview.com/article/ftc-targets-adobe-hidden-fe...
But it is the way it is now for at least three+ years. People are still thinking they're beating the system.
Does it try to ensnare users trying to save some money now? Sure, it does. It offers some revenue planning for Adobe in return for a discount. The FTC is basically arguing that there shouldn't be such a discount.
My grounds for cancelling is that the software didn't work. And I don't mean in some qualitative sense. The software would just crash when opening files or creating new files.
Adobe never held up their end of the bargain - providing functioning software.
https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fexternal-prev...