Ask yourself why you (apparently) prefer degrowth to this.
Ask yourself why you (apparently) prefer degrowth to this.
I have no idea what the solution is, I've already admitted it's complex. But it's frightening that the conversation immediately devolves into assumptions about one's stance, and immediate disagreement with that stance. Even on a website like HN. That's a big problem, no?
To f with nature and believe the full impact is understood in advance is human hubris.
Scientists "performing miracles" is one of the ways humanity is caring for the planet.
I'm not saying we shouldn't do research like this. But it is not an automatic good, and it must go hand in hand with proper biological field work looked at from an evolutionary lens. Or we risk making things worse with our good intentions.
We don't know the future impact of these modified corals, but we know it will be catastrophic if they disappear. IMO it would be worse to let the corals simply die.
I'm not saying this is you alone. We all do this, but this comment is particularly egregious for it.