I'm in a couple of dozen groups on Facebook and they produce interesting and thoughtful content every day.
Of course I wish they were on the open web, but don't blame the network.
I'm in a couple of dozen groups on Facebook and they produce interesting and thoughtful content every day.
Of course I wish they were on the open web, but don't blame the network.
Since by definition it will need to be open to the majority of the world’s population, regardless of writing skill, but the bottom half of writers are already indistinguishable from cutting edge LLM output.
And no one can install some sort of worldwide identity verification system, or it wouldn’t be ‘open’ anymore.
How do you differentiate between say 20 real people with low skills and LLM output lightly edited by a high skilled individual?
Consider a normal criminal court case. Most witnesses don't know how to express themselves well neither in the written nor spoken word. Their testimony still holds value and gives important information.
And it’s not like a live video call, where a few seconds delay would be noticeable.
There would still be a real human being, just as smart as you, behind the LLM, but pretending to be say 20 different lower skilled people.
Yes, even scoundrels may supply to you true information for some period of time but eventually they will try to obtain their actual goals…