That was the "reason" the FDA nuked the MDMA approval. "Unblinded because people could tell if they were on placebo or active therefore how do we know it wasn't just placebo effect based on belief"
Seems spurious as:
- 1) how do you reliably measure "people could tell"?;
- 2) if people sensed it, likely they can sense when they are on active in a whole range of effective medicines, so seems a biased / moved-goalpost application of the "rules";
- 3) what does it matter if the strength of the drug effect is greater than the strength of the placebo? Ie, surely they can model and subtract and control, so what does it matter if the actual effect is more than placebo?
Ugh...