It's not interesting. Boring people did this a million times, the result is always the same: just use for loops.

> Tips for lazy developers > I cannot recommend it, but in case you are too lazy for repeating lo. everywhere, you can import the entire library into the namespace.

    import (
        . "github.com/samber/lo"
    )

TIL. Crazy

Back when the Go team announced generics, I had a go (pun intended) at it: https://github.com/gtramontina/go-extlib -- might resurrect it one day. `lo` is pretty comprehensive though.

Here's one: https://github.com/szmcdull/glinq It doesn't do function chaining though.