Bluesky struggles to moderate child abuse material in Portuguese
nucleo.jor.br
nucleo.jor.br
The CP rings showed up at much higher levels than before with the Brazil bump. We run every image through Thorn’s fingerprinting service. That helps us with attempts to upload the media, but then they advertise telegrams and you have to root them out.
Is it insidious and just totally under the surface everywhere or is it more localized?
> Why doesn’t Bluesky block known keywords and terms like “child pornography” or “cp”?
> Does Bluesky have different strategies for dealing with text posts discussing child sexual abuse or grooming and images of child exploitation?
That's 90s tech and useless today. Not only are long-term accounts never going to post it verbatim (if they want to survive on the platform), it will block both normal communication about the issue and unrelated things (lots of cp in shell scripts). There are way better approaches to detection available.
When anyone tries that anyway, we get the expected results. Like "the event that can't be mentioned" and "unalive" on YouTube.
Then I guess shell scripts are next.