How does the use of certificate pinning mean anything when a FISA court can demand the keys and issue a gag order to prevent public disclosure?
2. Even if they did, chrome has enforced certificate transparency, so a gag order on the CA/CT provider would simply result in the certificate being rejected.
As far as you and i know. Those things are not public. Helps with espionage (see Crypto AG).
Also this problem would apply to any key like gpg. Well, as long as it's not in a Hardware security module. Of course they could also seize that but at some point it becomes logistically impractical, at least for mass surveillance.