New Italian Law Threatens ISPs with Prison over Piracy Reporting Failures
torrentfreak.com
torrentfreak.com
Football League SERIE A (Soccer for the US friends)
Government
Football SERIE A
Judiciary
Mafia | Government
Policia
Public
Non-italians
Interestingly, complying with Italian law could mean violating laws elsewhere
(Sorry, I can imagine their being penalties for an ISP/site operator erroneously reporting something, but nothing for media companies)
Crossing the border from Italy to Europe means 2-4x the salary. Crossing from Europe to North America means another 2x (or more, it depends)
I'm pointing out that if you cross the border, it is easy to find dev jobs that pay a lot more than italian jobs. Salary in Italy have been stagnant for over 10 years (more now. Haven't looked at the job market in a while). At the time, it was 30k gross vs 70k for positions in Germany (and some 90k too, i assume those were outliers).
A few of my friends moved to Iceland and hit those salaries (and more) without troubles
The reality is that if you are a halfway competent worker, and you move to a populated area, you can pretty easily find a job with health insurance. I work in manufacturing and all the manufacturers offer health care to all their full time workers. The bar for those jobs is basically "Have a pulse, show up to work, and be able to build a 10 yr old level Lego set". Pay is usually $17-22/hr, day one no experience.
Just don't pick the $30/month healthcare option. That's how people who "work full time with insurance" end up with that "here is my $50,000 bill for falling off a ladder, thanks America".
If you can stomach the $200 to $250/month plans, you will get better healthcare than anywhere in Europe.
This is absolutely true, especially for tech workers but doesn't it concern you that you need to be a cog in the machine to get this benefit?
If you want to work for yourself ("the American dream") you either have to risk having no insurance or pay $700+ a month for baseline coverage for 1 person (price varies by state). There was even a time a few years ago where you had to pay a federal penalty if you didn't have medical insurance. I forgot the exact year, maybe it was 2016 or so but I remember the government forcing me to pay around ~$3,000 for literally not having insurance.
Never mind having to advocate for someone in the hospital and be continually chummy with the nurses so they see your family member as a person worth their stretched attention rather than just another body to keep warm and checklisted, while also nudging them to the mitigate the systematic incompetence but not too much lest you end up on the shit list.
I can't speak to Europe's systems though. Perhaps they're even worse.
I have probably seen 20 doctors in the last 2 years for ongoing health issues, and never once did I get two different doctors from a group practice. You would have to request that since when you make an appointment you make it for the doctor you want to see specifically.
However urgent cares are pretty much exactly as you describe, so perhaps you are confusing group practice with urgent care? Hospitals are also kind of in the same vein as urgent cares too.
If you have the means, I would highly suggest finding a good primary care doctor. Mine will sit with me for an hour if needed, no rushing, talks through everything. Search locally and you can check reviews online. Although the best ones are often not taking new patients, you have to shop around a bit.
Yes, you can request your next appointment with the same doctor (modulo having to wait even longer). But that doesn't change the overall dynamic where they've been set up to give you mere slivers of time while outsourcing their working memory to janky computer systems. And while you can develop an ongoing relationship with one doctor, they can still leave suddenly because they've hit their individual breaking point from the practice's continual screw turning.
I know there are some good doctors out there. For example our pediatrician has been great (after a bit of a bumpy start due to overall industry-wide CYA dynamics). But a few shining examples, if you can even manage to invest the effort and find them, don't really change the quality of the overall system. Especially when many situations basically require relying on the whole system.
A dream, really :D
I beg to differ, Switzerland is top notch and at least comparable to above. Accident insurance is mandatory for all employers and you pay 0 nothing, sickness insurance is slightly above the costs you mention and paid by every resident. Due to country being tiny you are never too far from really well staffed and equipped hospitals. I'd expect nordics have also at least very decent healthcare system.
Plus when you have any sort of issue, any normal employer is not desperately looking for ways to fire you quickly. Social safety net is on completely another level compared to US. Also lower taxes. Healthier environment to live, much better food. Vastly better and free public school system. And so on. If you plan kids, US costs will quickly spiral out of control unless on FAANG salaries, and then you have corresponding costs. Or you just let have your kids have those wonderful student loans, fuck their freedom and best years right.
But yes its still probably the most capitalistic country in Europe, and they are where they are due to all this, not some alt-right fairy tales about evil bankers and nazi gold I keep hearing from those who skipped way too many history (and other) lessons at school. Germany could be at same level but 8x more if they didn't adopt continuously ridiculously bad social direction and dangerously terrible and weak leaders. Alas, Germany's economical future and conversely EU's doesn't look that great due to this.
Sources? My friends in the US who are from the EU and moved for some version of the American dream seem to disagree. And the point is; I don't want my 'job' to be in charge of my health insurance, ever. It is a perverse incentive (they can blackmail me with it and a lot more things; not legal, but I haven't seen many companies care about that little inconvenience). They should pay into it, but when I lose my job, my insurance should continue as if nothing happened. $250/mo is absolutely nothing though; I have friends on private plans double or more that and they still got fucked in the US because 'some reasons'/contract blah; when you are ill you don't want to bother with that shit; you just should get what you paid for for decades, not hire lawyers and have to go to court with a central line in you. That simply doesn't happen here; I will not get refused anything I need, even if I pay E0 (which I do not). Sure it might end some time, but it's gonna be a toss up depending on the coming years who has it worse.
It always goes the same way.
In sweden or germany they're just as corrupt, but also believe to belong to a superior race, so keep repeating to themselves that these things only happen to those people with dark skin, not to them!
Plenty of corruption around me in sweden goes completely unpunished. They just pin it all on the low level guy (who's often an immigrant) and never involve any higher up (who's often not an immigrant).
Entertainment, Telecom (Broadcasting, Media), and Pharma are overrepresented in most members of the EU, and the tech industry is underrepresented in much of the EU.
The US doesn't have similarly as draconian regulations because tech companies like Google and Netflix backed the EFF in lobbying against these kinds of regulations.
You could say "google, etc have could check first" but the volume of notices they receive mean it is not fair to them either - checking every single claim manually, in the knowledge that if they ever get it wrong (even in good faith) they become a corporation engaging in piracy (so the 100k/violation limit applies afaict).
The fact that Google, et al seem unable to require a confirmed US contact, and correctly filed forms is similarly absurd -- I think this came up in the past, and G had said a bunch of "legitimate" (as in major corporations that had no excuse) DMCA filers keep filing incorrectly but were threatening lawsuits if G pushed back on them.
The reality is the DMCA needs to be amended (I am under no illusions of it ever being repealed, and to an extent it does enable platforms like YouTube, etc to exist) to:
* Require DMCA requests to be filed by entities with a confirmed legal US presence (allowing a delay in take down for confirmation of identity with a new reporter) - i.e. an entity that can be sued in the US, even if just a law firm,
* Allow responders to enforce stricter policies on requests for organizations that have made "mistakes" in the past (maybe starting with allowing a delay to permit a response from the target prior to takedown, requiring a bond, all the way through to disallowing requests from organizations and individuals that have made sufficient false claims - currently it does not matter how many erroneous claims are made, claims must basically be taken as accurate because they've been declared true)
* Allow delayed takedowns for fair use cases (ie. if the target content is a small part of the target content, allow someone to look at it manually to see if it's plausibly fair use, or require a deposit from the reporter to cover the penalty if the target is found to be fair use) - basically it's more reasonable to say "take down this post that is just my music/video/movie immediately" than "take down this 15 minute post because it has a 30s sample from my music/video/movie immediately". Especially when the latter is often used to censor criticism.
* Allow the responding organization and the subject of the takedown to separately receive compensation for erroneous and fraudulent claims, including associated legal costs. I think you need both to be able to demand compensation separately so that people targeting non-US victims can still be subjected to penalties and costs via google when the victim cannot sue, and so that they victims can also get compensated.
* Require prosecution of perjured DMCA claims (again, this is why confirmed US legal presence should be required for these claims)
But none of that will happen :-/
-_-'
The current government has done other laws in that sense. Which incidentally allow blocking any website.