Copyright isn't required once any work can be created faster than you can snap your fingers.
It was originally a way to motivate creation of artistic works, since they used to involve a lot of effort.
It was originally a way to motivate creation of artistic works, since they used to involve a lot of effort.
Copyright isn't required if you use a tool built upon violating copyright?
Breathing isn't required if someone strangles everyone to death.
(Now we can all transcend breathing, in the new post-living higher plane of existence. Which surely is viable and great, and totally won't be abused to enrich the worst people, to the detriment of everyone else.)
Do you believe that is going to happen?
That's why its copyright and not artistright.
not a lot of effort by the parasites
You are aware of the way things are trending, right? Is the trend showing any sign that it might reverse, for the rest of human civilization's time?
I liked when things were simpler too, but the reality (for better or worse) seems to be that AI is not going away.
AI is in a hype cycle at the moment. Once tech companies realise that they're not going to be able to recoup the billions of dollars they've dumped into the money hole, they'll either raise prices or withdraw products (or a mixture of both).
Consumers, by and large, don't like generative AI. Or at least they don't like it enough to make it pay for itself.
we'll see what happens once the parasites have killed the host
So true, then abstract expressionism appeared and suddenly copyright wasn't a thing anymore.