It's a work of fiction. If you were entertained, how does it matter whether it was a human or a machine who wrote it? And does the degree matter?
the article itself is only an analysis of an already present fictional world, created by humans. such content is secondary- or third-rate in nature.
also, the focus on being simply 'entertained' sounds rather depressing to me
Shining a laser through a silicon crystal faceted by innumerable human experience is interesting, but that laser does not engage with the human experience of endeavor / struggle.
It loses an important facet of experience.