I find quite refreshing to see her examine the evidence sceptically and rationally instead of just assuming whatever the current trend is true and working backwards to cherry pick evidence to fit it, as many popular science communicators do.
Like for example, the presenter's supposed review of the literature is to carefully select a handful of research papers and read through the conclusions in the abstracts, without providing any critical analysis at all. She's clearly very biased and that comes across in how she presents this.
I see she's doing exactly what I mentioned in my earlier comment:
> assuming whatever the current trend is is true and working backwards to cherry pick evidence to fit it
It's not really a debunking or a repudiation of what Sabine Hossenfelder says in her video, it's really just the presenter pushing her own staunchly held opinion while trying to pretend she's applying some sort of sceptical analysis. Unfortunately this is quite a common trick amongst self-styled "sceptic" types when it comes to topics they feel strongly about.