Hacker News Reader

Comment by LeoPanthera | Hacker News Reader

You're not wrong, but that's useless nitpicking. We're not going to suddenly introduce a brand new radio standard that no-one has a radio for.

There are literally millions of AM radios out there in the US, at the already agreed frequency range. For emergency broadcast uses, the increased quality of FM is meaningless.

View on HN

The advantage of am over fm is the simplicity of the electronic circuit. In am its very easy to create a receiver to listen to broadcast. While an fm radio is too complicated for amature electronic.

So i dont belive am will ever be dropped for emergency radio

FM radios aren't complicated at all. And FM transmitters, in particular, are extremely simple. When I was a student we had a tiny one we made in an afternoon (this was decades ago), we connected it to our 8-hour reel tape deck and had our own music station in the car radio when we drove around in the area. The advantage of AM is, as was mentioned already, the lower frequency used by AM which means much better coverage. FM 87MHz-108MHz is almost just line of sight.

No much to a coil, antenna and a germanium diode.

The geranium diode is doing most of the heavy lifting. Good luck building that from scratch.

https://rimstar.org/science_electronics_projects/razor_blade...

Galena cat whiskers were quite common: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_detector

And how is that relevant to the alleged complexity of building an AM radio vs an FM one? The point was that the latter is easy, not complicated. The FM transmitter is so easy to make that you can make one by accident - if there's a non-linear element in the rf part.

Its about the simplicity of the circuit. The components are available for any electronic Technician.

Use an amplifier is not a basic circuit. Resistor diode capacitor cable and power source are the basic of electronics

You can actually receive FM very simply. Here was an amusing post on Reddit [1] a few years ago from someone who was trying to make a simple audio amplifier and found that it was receiving his local NPR station which was broadcasting FM on 88.3 MHz. After some experimenting he got it down to just a cheap op amp, 2 capacitors, 1 potentiometer, a 9 V battery, a speaker, and some wire for an antenna.

It is working through slope detection. Basically if you've got FM at frequency X carrying voice and you measure the energy at a frequency a little bit away from X, as the FM signal frequency varies due to the voice modulation the energy you measure near X will vary in a similar way, so your voice modulation of the frequency X becomes amplitude modulation of your energy measurement.

You can play with this on an SDR, such as a cheap RTL-SDR dongle. Find an FM station and tune to its center frequency with your SDR software set for FM demodulation, and verify that you are indeed on an FM station broadcasting voice and/or music. Then switch the SDR software to AM demodulation and start slowly tuning away from the FM center frequency. You should find a point where you can clearly hear the voice and/or music. It won't sound great compared to FM demodulation of the same station, or compared to an AM station, but it should be serviceable for receiving emergency information.

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/HamRadio/comments/oz5rri/i_accident...

It is not useless nitpicking, it is the sole reason of your argument why the 300 meter band covers more area than the 3 meter band.

It's useless nitpicking because in the US, AM vs FM comes coupled with those frequency ranges. We're as likely to get a brand new radio standard at this point as we are a replacement to the NEMA connector, so the next best thing is to just use the standard we already have that does the job well enough.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com