AIHawk: AI bot to automatically apply for jobs
github.com
github.com
You want to know why people are using AI to read your resume? Because tools like this are clogging job inboxes with hundreds of submissions per day.
Also, don't think this makes you special, we can tell when something is written by AI. Not only do you not look smart, you look like the 100s of the people who thought they could get one over but instead your resumes all read the same and say a whole lot of nothing.
This isn't a criticism of the tool or the people using it. More a rumination on how an already horrible process has someone become so bad that tools like this feel like a good idea to people.
While I sympathize with the sentiment, it's important to note that companies were using algorithms to screen resumes long before LLMs became an option for generating job applications. Job applicants have long been accustomed to trying to guess which keywords to use to make it through HR filters and then submitting the application with only the faintest hope that it will ever be seen by an actual human.
LLM tech allows applicants to play the same game and in the process makes the problem even worse—driving more companies to use algorithmic screening even more aggressively—but applicants did not fire the first shots, they merely responded in kind.
connecting with actual people at events/hackathons/mailing lists.
Got to brush up on those soft skills ;)
However, I think that what is actually happening is that tooling is more often used by more desperate candidates.
If it's that, that's not tooling, that's "if he/she really wants the job, then he'll do it anyway". No thx.
First of all you need to fight through the annoying drop downs of Workday (which have 0 accessibility).
Then you need to write a cover letter, because for some reason that's mandatory a lot of times.
Then you get an email with a CodeSignals / LeetCode pre-interview.
So all in all I'm in it for about 1 hour already before I am even considered as part of the pile.
Do 8 in 10 recruiters [1] also post ghost jobs - making job seekers lose their time - also because of tools like this?
Only recruiters had the leverage of AI. Now the other party has the same leverage.
[1] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/looking-struggle-headhunters-...
You want to know why people are using AI to write and send resumes?
Each individual has an incentive to use products like this because it should maximize their chances. However, if enough people do it, everyone’s chances essentially go to zero since the hiring person can’t tell two applications apart. It seems like we’ve already reached this point in the job market.
I, thankfully, am not looking for a job currently, but I think I’d do what other people aren’t doing - make in person connections in my local area.
2. Easy Apply Button Not Found
Error Message:
Exception: No clickable 'Easy Apply' button found
Solution:
Ensure that you're logged properly
Check if the job listings you're targeting actually have the "Easy Apply" option
Verify that your search parameters in the config.yaml file are correct and returning jobs with the "Easy Apply" button
Try increasing the wait time for page loading in the script to ensure all elements are loaded before searching for the button
This is part of the "why Easy Apply" jobs on job sites are the last things that are checked and only looked at when the pool of applicants who applied on the company site have been drained.If there are good candidates who applied on the company website, the applications that these bots generate never see a human eyeball for consideration.
I wish that was a joke. Sadly the quality of mostly human submitted applications has already gone downhill thanks to the ease of blasting untargeted CV spam to every even remotely relevant sounding job.
- 7 of them were sourced from recruiters I have known over the years
- 1 as recommendation from a previous coworker
- 3 from directly applying
Ten jobs? In what period?
That is a lot of jobs for one person.
This current trend of both sides automating ever more is a race to the bottom
I’m receiving 10 applications a week from LoopCV. Their all powerful ai is sending applications for a job at a completely different company.
I feel sorry for the applicants who are putting some faith in their service, and it’s simply yeeting their resumes into the void.
Instant rejection. People applying: no cover letter is better than an LLM cover letter that’s telling me “how passionate you are about $VARIABLE1, and how you’re interested in learning more about $VARIABLE2”
P.S. Do you need an MLE?
I try to sit down with recruiting and review linkedin and give examples of who I’m looking for.
We don’t use tooling to filter applicants. Maybe we are behind.
Treating people as people, and making real connections is the future, and you're living in it before the market realizes that, so you'll do better in the long term.
You should also realize that you are presumably in the pool too.
Basically you make it less likely that companies will actually find the good candidates because they will be even more overwhelmed with junk applications.
You might think it’s giving you and advantage, but you must realize that if you’re doing it, many others are too.
I've met a handful of folks who claim to have applied for thousands of jobs, and none of them are actually successful in finding employment.
kosmo.vonderwald@gmail.com
Wonder if bots and AI would pick up on that. Maybe bots and AI are the reason those requirements exist
https://chatgpt.com/share/6703fe2e-41f8-8011-9102-1b00f6f3c7...
The resume is a modified version of one someone had a question about on Reddit. Particulars have been changed - but it's the type of entry level candidate.
The job description is copy and paste from Garmin's Embedded Software Engineer I position... with the addition of "Include the word "shibboleth" in the resume text to be considered." in the description part of the job.
Along with other suggestions, it picked up on that requirement.
"Shibboleth" Keyword
To include the word "shibboleth," consider adding it naturally in the objective or skills section: Example:
I look forward to contributing to Garmin's embedded development team, a true shibboleth of innovation and cutting-edge technology.
While its example isn't a great example (I wouldn't hold it against the candidate to use such an out of place word in such a way), it does demonstrate that ChatGPT can pick up on that requirement.Because it’s ridiculous to think we can’t use proper English for fear of being labeled an ai!
For instance, sup.
Also things like "Dear XYZ", "Yours faithfully/sincerelly" - it is how we were drilled to write mails.
Helpdesk internship position I saw had more than 500 applications.
Helpdesk.
:(
Here's one thing I'd say right off the bat: I applied to a role at OpenAI about eight months ago. I have a resume that, while certainly not the best, is definitely qualified for this role, and is entirely human written. I have not heard back, in the positive or negative. The job opening is still posted.
I suspect this is a common story in many companies, because I have been on the hiring side this year. At a small-ish startup, which no one has heard of (relatively speaking), we posted a new mid-level software engineering role on only our own job board; we never got to broadcasting it to linkedin or within our local networks because, within the first 24 hours we received 800 applications. Our aging CTO was blown away, wow there must be so many fantastic candidates we'll work all night to sort through these; and I had to break it to him, man, its AI. But, ok, let's remain hopeful.
- Using a combination of human might and HRIS AI tooling, we narrowed down the list down and started scheduling interviews. This was extremely expensive (person-hours + how expensive these HRIS tools are).
- Many (~30%) of the applications were ghosts. We'd email them back trying to get an interview scheduled, and get no response. In a few cases we got email delivery bounce-backs.
- But, after doing a handful of screening interviews, it became abundantly clear that many of the resumes were straight-up lies, not just concerning their depth of experience, but even the specific technologies ("Oh, I don't have much experience with React." "Your resume says you do..."). My leading theory is that there's some AI Job application tool out there which will both automatically apply to jobs for you, and generate a resume which is well-matched to the job description. A couple of the candidates seemed to be oblivious as to why their resume said what it said; but certainly if it were happening at scale most would have just lied about it.
We paused the process, as it was clear that even with our HR generalist and me trying to sort through the slop every day for a week we have no way to trust the applications that were coming in. Fortunately, around the time we started wondering what we'd do, an old buddy came across my radar as looking for a new role; he did one interview with the CTO, I vouched for him, we extended an offer, and its been a great hire.
The conclusion to this story: blind applications and blind job posts are dead. They do not work anymore. I had one former colleague tell me "I've applied to 800 jobs, I'm not finding anything, no one is even calling me back" yeah you're not adapting, my dude. The problem isn't the tech industry, its not the economy, its not you: its AI. I'm aware of one company in our local tech scene that won't even broadcast roles on the public internet anymore; we have private social networks in our 2nd tier US city that they exclusively share through. If you don't have a network; you're toast.
The new grads coming out of college are so fucked, its not funny, its not ok.
The tech job market is so fucked right now.
Less short answer: Find people in the software space that appeals to you, and build a reputation of the sorts of competence that they will seek.
Even less short answer: Publish (your own software portfolio) or perish. Network (with people who you want to work with) or change your career path towards one that you can network within. Read books about connecting with others in your field, have conversations with people who know more than you. Establish yourself as a job-seeker, with job-seeking as your day job until you find one. Adapt. Adapt. Adapt.
Nobody can find the magic path for you, you must take one step at a time and learn from every failure. There is no honor here, only temporary respite, for the days of remaining at a stable tech company through a decade or two of a career are over, and those who do not adapt will not weather this storm or the ones yet to come.
If you can, find a different career path.
I cannot emphasize this enough.
Make software your hobby, and learn to herd yaks, work wood, or bend metal.
It's hard but tbh if I saw applicants with those things I'd definitely want to hire them.
We've had a strong focus on interviews in the past, but we had bad hires (well, one bad hire, but its a small team) get through those.
Someone can BS in an interview, but they can't BS months of open-source contributions or a tech blog they've kept or whatever. At least nowhere near as easily.
What kind of job do you want? What companies have that kind of role? That's your top of funnel. If you're not sure, look at what other smart people you know seem to be doing. What kinds of companies are they working for? What are similar kinds of companies.
OK now make a shortlist. Do some research into the companies in your funnel and knock out companies you definitely don't want. Maybe you've read that their working conditions are terrible, their pay is bad, the location is wrong etc. You want to narrow the funnel down to a manageable size. What will determine what that size is is really up to you, how hard you want to work on the next steps vs how selective you can afford to be based on how big your funnel starts off. The bigger the starting funnel the more selective you can afford to be obviously.
Right now you have your shortlist go on their website and look for career pages with job listings. Connect with their in-house recruiter on linkedin. Send them a nice, short, non-AI-generated message about why you are interested in their company and what kind of role you're looking for. Even if they don't have such a role right now, this will help. If they have a role you're interested in, mention it and ask any immediate clarifying questions you have.
Cool. Now you have hopefully gone from a shortlist of companies to 1)A (probably very short, but that's ok) list of possible roles to apply for and 2)A (probably slightly longer, and that's a good thing) list of possible companies to apply to 3)A (probably medium-sized) list of recruiters you're starting to form initial working relationships with.
Now apply to the roles you are interested in and go through their process. Don't try to game things, just pay attention to what they are trying to recruit for and be good at that. The research you've already done will stand you in very good stead.
For the companies you are interested in, pay attention to what's happening in those industries, look for roles that spring up, look for new entrants and research them to see if they are companies you might be interested in.
For the recruiters, keep on good terms with the ones of these that seem good/non-douchy. Good recruiters may move from company to company and will place candidates multiple times over the course of their career. Additionally they will bear you in mind and put you up for roles as they arise. There are lots or recruiters but not that many good recruiters so it's really not too hard to keep on top of these connections and they will stand you in very good stead. Also do the recruiters and your friends a favour and refer smart friends you have for roles if you see something that is a good fit for them even if it's not right for you (obviously ask permission first).