Maybe I’m out of touch but I don’t get people complaining about the „takers“ in the maker-taker-problem. If you are offended when people take your stuff without contributing, don’t make it open source. Maybe it’s just me being too cynical but people taking my open source stuff and contributing nothing is basically the expectation, everything else is a welcome positive surprise. But I would never get angry and badmouth other people because they dared taking my stuff I consciously open sourced earlier.
Also, imagine other open source projects doing this. Should Linux maintainers complain about every company using Linux Servers without contributing to the kernel? Or would offering Linux hosting be the better analogy? What percentage of Linux hosting providers has written a single kernel patch and contributed it?