If Netflix were a solely streaming operation, it'd make sense for Amazon, or if tax on ecommerce was already charged in most states regardless of physical presence it would make sense. Not sure it does otherwise, though.
If Netflix were a solely streaming operation, it'd make sense for Amazon, or if tax on ecommerce was already charged in most states regardless of physical presence it would make sense. Not sure it does otherwise, though.
Amazing.
All of these people balking at the high carbon footprints of these companies would have a fucking field day.
Had my facts a little mixed up (it's 43 distribution centers, not in 45 states). Anyway, take it for what you will. :)
"Items sold by Amazon.com LLC, or its subsidiaries, and shipped to destinations in the states of Kansas, Kentucky, New York, North Dakota, or Washington are subject to tax."
http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=4...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon.com#Fulfillment_and_ware...
Some states require sales tax on ecommerce if there is a physical presence, some do not. Some require tax regardless.
The argument I have always heard in relation to Netflix is that if Amazon were to acquire Netflix it would mean charging sale tax to a much greater number of customers.
Netflix has many more established physical presences across the US: http://www.listology.com/netflix_tracker_reports.cfm?report=...